Those who have ploughed the deep & rocky furrow that is 9/11 investigations will recognise the name Thierry Meyssan. What we now know as the 9/11 Truth phenomenon began in 2002 in Europe, with Meyssan's articles, films & books. Here's what the New Statesman said about him in 2002:
The most common theories of all, however, derive from Thierry Meyssan's bestselling book L'effroyable imposture (The Frightening Fraud). Meyssan is the director of the Voltaire Network, a prominent left-wing think-tank, and it is hard to overestimate the impact of his book in France. It were as though Matthew Taylor of the IPPR or Mark Leonard of the Foreign Policy Centre had suddenly announced that the US government was involved in the 11 September attacks. Central to Meyssan's thesis is the argument that the Pentagon was not struck by a plane at all, but rather that a carefully planned truck bombing or missile strike was set up by the US government to look like a plane crash. He believes that the government plotted the whole affair, in part to control rogue agents within the security services. (Johann Hari.)
The idea that it was not an airliner, but a missile or some other weapon, that hit the pentagon, became what was called the No Planes Theory, & it caused ane early split in the online 9/11 investigations community, dividing it into two sometimes hostile camps. To promote the No Planes Theory it was necessary to explain the hundreds of people driving along the beltway that passed less than 500 metres from the Pentagon Building who said they saw an airliner.
Supporters of the No Planes Theory are now a tiny but tenacious minority. I've read some very tightly argued pieces from its proponents, involving holograms & mass hypnosis, but for me there are just too many eyewitness accounts that mention airliners.
As you might expect, it was not long before opponents of the No Planes Theory began to openly suspect that the theory itself was part of a disinformation operation run by elements of the Security Services, to make 9/11 investigators look like headbangers.
So, after that bit of background, this is the source of my information concerning Sarkozy's connection with the CIA. Do I think Sarkozy is a CIA plant? Entirely probable, but more evidence needed.
You can see Meyssan's article, in a sometimes muddled English translation, & in the original French, at Axisoflogic
Truth-telling and treaty: Australian Indigenous lawyer’s commitment to real
change for First Nations People
-
"For me, cultural continuity is both a responsibility and a source of
strength. It reminds me of why this work matters and who it is ultimately
for."
2 days ago
0 Reply to "Sarkozy & the CIA"
Leave a Comment